Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Next Doctor Who episode- speculation

  • May. 7th, 2008 at 5:12 PM
doctor and donna, team rose, tenth doctor, someday my prince will come, donna, darcy- *swoon*, buffy/angel OTP, hair!, luke/leia, torchwood, ten/jack, nine/rose promos, Mickey, lazing around in the tardis, rose tyler, tennant ruffle, kara/ supergirl, ten/rose drawing, she's back!, prince caspian, nine, rose communicates, 10 rose, ready for adventure?, tenth doctor in planet of the ood, sarah jane/ 3, don't mess with miss sweetcorn, 10/rose 10 minutes ago, team tardis S1, badwolfrose, 2 docs, nine/rose, eight, nine and rose dance
I remember there was apparently a scene cut when David first became the doctor where he explains to Rose that his regeneration was based on her. I heard there was something of a line such as 'like a chicken to an egg' (my memory is fuzzy). So now we have the doctor's daughter who looks like the offspring of Rose and the Doctor but we now know that its not through 'traditional' means. If the doctor reproduced a girl through this body using a reproduction machine it would stand to reason she would bear a resemblance to Rose because that is who the doctor's form is based on. This may be touched on in the episode hence the guy who read the Sunday Herald implying Rose was somehow involved. (or he could have been mistaken).

Tags:

Comments

[info]the_lucky_stars wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 04:36 pm (UTC)
Ooh, nice theory, actually... aw, I'm so sad they cut that line from TCI. It was so sweet!
[info]mrbartleboom wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 05:24 pm (UTC)
Oh god. That scene would've been SO sweet. Is there a way we can see it? It's said in some documentary, or could it be part of some extra in dvd boxes?
[info]04nbod wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 05:30 pm (UTC)
no I think it was cut during scripting. According to RTD they cut loads of dialogue about ten being 'new' because David walked in and owned the role
[info]sunnytyler001 wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 05:44 pm (UTC)
Oh, I quite like this idea!
[info]melissah1 wrote:
May. 7th, 2008 05:55 pm (UTC)
I never heard of that before I like it!
[info]angelfireeast wrote:
May. 8th, 2008 12:22 am (UTC)
Good theory.
[info]teskafuture wrote:
May. 8th, 2008 01:32 am (UTC)
*grin* I was just thinking of a similiar type of theory based on that same info from TCI.